5 Pragmatic Ranking Lessons From The Pros: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

curprev 01:0201:02, 8 January 2025‎ LaraHurst020873 talk contribs‎ m 9,591 bytes +177‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 17:0117:01, 7 January 2025‎ SheldonMillen talk contribs‎ m 9,414 bytes +182‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 21:4021:40, 6 January 2025‎ NganPagan2301 talk contribs‎ m 9,232 bytes −381‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 08:5508:55, 25 December 2024‎ ReinaldoHumble3 talk contribs‎ m 9,613 bytes −186‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 03:1403:14, 25 December 2024‎ RedaOMay9742934 talk contribs‎ m 9,799 bytes +460‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 14:1114:11, 20 December 2024‎ WYXMargaret talk contribs‎ m 9,339 bytes +21‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 05:4705:47, 24 November 2024‎ CharlineVanguild talk contribs‎ m 9,318 bytes −189‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 01:1101:11, 24 November 2024‎ MelvinTramel3 talk contribs‎ m 9,507 bytes +18‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 00:0500:05, 26 September 2024‎ Elliot22F09621 talk contribs‎ 9,489 bytes +9,489‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>The advancement of implementation research and practice requires measures that are practical and psychometrically robust. This study aimed to develop a practical measurement criterion that was developed by a stakeholder-led process. A systematic review of literature and semi-structured stakeholder interviews produced 47 pragmatic rating criteria.<br><br>Based on the data from Scopus WOS and Lens A ranked list of top pragmatics authors was created..."

8 January 2025

7 January 2025

6 January 2025

25 December 2024

20 December 2024

24 November 2024

26 September 2024