A Look At The Myths And Facts Behind Pragmatic Ranking: Revision history

7 January 2025

• curprev 09:2509:25, 7 January 2025‎ LindaNeustadt10 talk contribs‎ m 10,134 bytes +774‎ No edit summary undo

5 January 2025

• curprev 07:5307:53, 5 January 2025‎ Franchesca81Z talk contribs‎ m 9,360 bytes −239‎ No edit summary undo

20 December 2024

• curprev 08:4908:49, 20 December 2024‎ Woodrow59K talk contribs‎ m 9,599 bytes +85‎ No edit summary undo

26 November 2024

• curprev 18:4918:49, 26 November 2024‎ ArthurBrowne522 talk contribs‎ m 9,514 bytes −31‎ No edit summary undo

25 November 2024

• curprev 01:4201:42, 25 November 2024‎ RobtShick51 talk contribs‎ 9,545 bytes +9,545‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>To advance research on implementation and practice, it is important to have measures that are both practical and psychometrically reliable. This study aimed to establish practical measurement criteria by using a collaborative stakeholder-based process. A systematic review of literature and semi-structured stakeholder conversations resulted in 47 practical rating criteria.<br><br>A ranked list of top pragmatics authors was developed based on the c..."