The Reasons Pragmatic Ranking Is More Difficult Than You Think: Revision history

7 January 2025

• curprev 15:2015:20, 7 January 2025‎ ArnulfoVirgo5 talk contribs‎ m 9,686 bytes +24‎ No edit summary undo

24 December 2024

• curprev 12:2712:27, 24 December 2024‎ TheresaMiele95 talk contribs‎ m 9,662 bytes −67‎ No edit summary undo

23 December 2024

• curprev 09:5609:56, 23 December 2024‎ ModestaMcBrien talk contribs‎ m 9,729 bytes +243‎ No edit summary undo

27 November 2024

• curprev 01:3901:39, 27 November 2024‎ SandyBoisvert talk contribs‎ m 9,486 bytes +34‎ No edit summary undo

24 November 2024

• curprev 11:5111:51, 24 November 2024‎ KristalCromwell talk contribs‎ 9,452 bytes +9,452‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>The advancement of implementation research and practice requires measures that are well-constructed and practical. This study aimed to establish a practical measurement criteria set through a collaborative stakeholder process. A systematic literature review and semi-structured interview with stakeholders resulted in 47 practical rating categories.<br><br>A list of the top pragmatics authors was developed using the citations data from Scopus, WOS,..."