The Three Greatest Moments In Free Pragmatic History: Difference between revisions

From VSt Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the connection between context, language and meaning. It addresses questions such as What do people really mean when they use words?<br><br>It's a philosophy that is based on practical and reasonable actions. It contrasts with idealism which is the idea that one must adhere to their beliefs regardless of the circumstances.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the ways that language users gain meaning from and each one another. It is usually thought of as a part of the language however it differs from semantics in that pragmatics examines what the user wants to convey rather than what the meaning actually is.<br><br>As a field of study the field of pragmatics is relatively new and research in the area has grown rapidly over the last few decades. It is primarily an academic area of study within linguistics, but it also has an impact on research in other fields like speech-language pathology, psychology sociolinguistics and anthropology.<br><br>There are a variety of perspectives on pragmatics, and they have contributed to its growth and development. One of these is the Gricean pragmatics approach, which focuses primarily on the notions of intention and its interaction with the speaker's knowledge of the listener's comprehension. Other perspectives on pragmatics include lexical and conceptual approaches to pragmatics. These perspectives have contributed to the wide range of subjects that researchers in pragmatics have researched.<br><br>The study of pragmatics has covered a wide range topics, such as L2 pragmatic comprehension and request production by EFL students, and the significance of the theory of mind in physical and mental metaphors. It has been applied to cultural and social phenomena like political discourse, discriminatory speech, and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also used diverse methodologies from experimental to sociocultural.<br><br>The size of the knowledge base in pragmatics varies according to the database, as illustrated in Figure 9A-C. The US and the UK are among the top researchers in pragmatics research, but their positions differ based on the database. This is due to pragmatics being a multidisciplinary area that intersects other disciplines.<br><br>It is therefore difficult to rank the top pragmatics authors based on the quantity of their publications. However it is possible to identify the most influential authors by examining their contributions to the field of pragmatics. Bambini is one example. He has contributed to pragmatics with concepts such as politeness and conversational implicititure theories. Other authors who have been influential in pragmatics include Grice, Saul and Kasper.<br><br>What is Free Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics focuses on the users and contexts of language usage instead of focusing on reference, 프라그마틱 슬롯 환수율 ([https://maps.google.gg/url?q=https://moran-soelberg-2.mdwrite.net/why-nobody-cares-about-pragmatic-slot-recommendations Https://maps.google.gg/url?q=https://moran-soelberg-2.mdwrite.net/why-nobody-cares-about-pragmatic-slot-recommendations]) truth, or grammar. It focuses on how one utterance may be understood differently in different contexts. This includes ambiguity and indexicality. It also focuses on strategies that hearers use to determine if phrases are intended to be communicated. It is closely related to the theory of conversational implicature, which was developed by Paul Grice.<br><br>While the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is a well-known, long-established one, there is a lot of debate regarding the exact boundaries of these fields. Some philosophers argue that the notion of meaning of sentences is a part of semantics, [http://www.bitspower.com/support/user/airchef09 프라그마틱 게임] 정품확인 - [https://www.google.bt/url?q=https://squareblogs.net/rhythmegg6/15-top-pinterest-boards-from-all-time-about-how-to-check-the-authenticity-of https://www.google.bt/] - while others claim that this type of problem should be considered pragmatic.<br><br>Another issue is whether pragmatics is a branch of philosophy of languages or a subset of the study of the study of linguistics. Some researchers have suggested that pragmatics is an autonomous discipline and should be considered a part of linguistics, along with phonology. Syntax, semantics, etc. Others, however have argued the study of pragmatics is a component of philosophy since it deals with the way in which our beliefs about the meaning and use of languages influence our theories about how languages function.<br><br>There are a few key issues in the study of pragmatics that have fuelled the debate. Some scholars have argued for instance that pragmatics isn't a subject by itself because it studies how people interpret and use the language without necessarily referring to actual facts about what was said. This type of approach is called far-side pragmatics. Some scholars have argued that this study should be considered a discipline in its own right since it examines the manner in which the meaning and usage of language is influenced by social and cultural factors. This is known as near-side pragmatics.<br><br>The field of pragmatics also focuses on the inferential nature and meaning of utterances, as well as the significance of the primary pragmatic processes in determining what a speaker means in the sentence. Recanati and Bach examine these issues in greater in depth. Both papers address the notions of saturation and free pragmatic enrichment. These are significant pragmatic processes in that they shape the overall meaning of an expression.<br><br>What is the difference between free and explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the role that context plays to the meaning of language. It studies the way that humans use language in social interaction as well as the relationship between the speaker and interpreter. Pragmaticians are linguists who specialize on pragmatics.<br><br>A variety of theories of pragmatics have been developed over the years. Some, such as Gricean pragmatics focus on the intention of communication of speakers. Others,  [https://www.ky58.cc/dz/home.php?mod=space&uid=2064540 프라그마틱 무료체험] such as Relevance Theory concentrate on the understanding processes that occur during the interpretation of utterances by listeners. Some approaches to pragmatics have been combined with other disciplines, such as cognitive science and philosophy.<br><br>There are also different views regarding the boundary between pragmatics and semantics. Morris is one philosopher who believes that semantics and pragmatism are two different subjects. He claims semantics is concerned with the relationship of signs to objects they may or may not refer to, whereas pragmatics is concerned with the use of words in a context.<br><br>Other philosophers, such as Bach and Harnish have also argued that pragmatics is a subfield of semantics. They define "near-side" and "far-side" pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics is concerned with what is said, whereas far-side is focused on the logical implications of uttering a phrase. They claim that semantics is already determining some of the pragmatics of an utterance, while other pragmatics are determined by pragmatic processes.<br><br>One of the most important aspects of pragmatics is that it is a context-dependent phenomenon. This means that a single word can have different meanings based on factors like indexicality or ambiguity. The structure of the conversation, the beliefs of the speaker and intentions, as well expectations of the audience can also alter the meaning of a word.<br><br>Another aspect of pragmatics is its particularity in culture. It is because every culture has its own rules regarding what is appropriate in various situations. For example, it is polite in some cultures to make eye contact but it is considered rude in other cultures.<br><br>There are many different perspectives on pragmatics and much research is being conducted in this field. There are many different areas of research, including formal and computational pragmatics as well as experimental and theoretical pragmatics, intercultural and cross pragmatics in linguistics, and  [https://maps.google.com.tr/url?q=https://diggerbeet83.bravejournal.net/10-locations-where-you-can-find-pragmatic-genuine 프라그마틱 무료체험 메타] clinical and experimentative pragmatics.<br><br>How does Free Pragmatics compare to Explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The linguistic discipline of pragmatics is concerned with the way meaning is conveyed through the use of language in context. It focuses less on the grammatical structure of an spoken word and more on what the speaker is saying. Pragmaticians are linguists who specialize on pragmatics. The subject of pragmatics is closely related to other linguistics areas, like syntax, semantics, and philosophy of language.<br><br>In recent years, the field of pragmatics has grown in various directions that include computational linguistics, pragmatics of conversation, and theoretic pragmatics. These areas are distinguished by a broad range of research that addresses issues like lexical characteristics and the interaction between language, discourse, and meaning.<br><br>One of the main questions in the philosophical discussion of pragmatics is whether or not it is possible to provide an accurate, systematic understanding of the pragmatics/semantics interface. Some philosophers have argued that it isn't (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have argued the distinction between semantics and pragmatics isn't well-defined, and that they are the same.<br><br>The debate between these positions is usually an ongoing debate scholars argue that particular phenomena fall under the umbrella of either semantics or pragmatics. For example, some scholars argue that if a statement has an actual truth-conditional meaning, then it is semantics, while others believe that the fact that an expression may be interpreted in various ways is pragmatics.<br><br>Other researchers in the field of pragmatics have taken a different approach in arguing that the truth-conditional meaning of an utterance is just one of the many ways in which an expression can be understood and that all of these interpretations are valid. This method is often known as far-side pragmatics.<br><br>Recent research in pragmatics has attempted to combine semantic and far side methods. It tries to capture the entire range of interpretive possibilities that can be derived from a speaker's words, by modeling the way in which the speaker's beliefs and intentions affect the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. (2019) combine the Gricean game theory model of the Rational Speech Act framework with technological innovations from Franke and Bergen (2020). The model predicts that listeners will consider a range of possible exhaustified versions of an utterance containing the universal FCI any which is what makes the exclusivity implicature so reliable when in comparison to other possible implicatures.
What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics studies the connection between language and context. It addresses issues like what do people mean by the terms they use?<br><br>It's a philosophies of practical and reasonable actions. It's in contrast to idealism, the notion that you must abide to your convictions.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics focuses on how people who speak a language interact and communicate with one and with each other. It is typically thought of as a part of language, although it differs from semantics in that pragmatics examines what the user wants to convey rather than what the actual meaning is.<br><br>As a field of research, pragmatics is relatively young and its research has grown quickly in the past few decades. It is a language academic field, but it has also had an impact on research in other fields like sociolinguistics, psychology and the field of anthropology.<br><br>There are many different perspectives on pragmatics, and they have contributed to its growth and development. One is the Gricean pragmatics approach, which focuses primarily on the notion of intention and the interaction with the speaker's knowledge about the listener's comprehension. Other perspectives on pragmatics include conceptual and lexical approaches to pragmatics. These views have contributed to the variety of topics that researchers in pragmatics have studied.<br><br>The research in pragmatics has been focused on a broad range of topics, including L2 pragmatic comprehension, request production by EFL learners and the role of the theory of mind in both mental and physical metaphors. It has also been applied to various social and cultural phenomena, like political discourse, discriminatory language and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also employed a variety of methodologies, from experimental to sociocultural.<br><br>Figure 9A-C illustrates that the size of the knowledge base on pragmatics is different depending on which database is used. The US and the UK are two of the top contributors in the field of pragmatics research. However, their position differs based on the database. This is due to pragmatics being a multidisciplinary area that intersects other disciplines.<br><br>It is therefore difficult to rank the top pragmatics authors according to the number of their publications. It is possible to determine influential authors based on their contributions to the field of pragmatics. For example Bambini's contribution to the field of pragmatics has led to concepts like conversational implicature and politeness theory. Grice, Saul, and Kasper are also highly influential authors of pragmatics.<br><br>What is Free Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics is more concerned with the contexts and the users of language as opposed to the study of truth or reference, or grammar. It examines the ways in which one utterance can be understood to mean various things depending on the context and also those caused by ambiguity or indexicality. It also focuses on methods that listeners employ to determine which words are meant to be communicative. It is closely connected to the theory of conversative implicature which was developed by Paul Grice.<br><br>While the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is a well-known, long-established one, there is a lot of debate regarding the exact boundaries of these disciplines. For instance philosophers have suggested that the concept of sentence's meaning is an aspect of semantics. Others have claimed that this sort of thing should be viewed as a pragmatic issue.<br><br>Another area of controversy is whether the study of pragmatics should be regarded as to be a linguistics branch or a part of the philosophy of language. Some researchers have suggested that pragmatics is a discipline in its distinct from the other disciplines and should be considered distinct from the field of linguistics, alongside syntax, phonology semantics and more. Others have suggested the study of pragmatics is a part of philosophy since it focuses on the way in which our beliefs about meaning and uses of languages influence our theories of how languages work.<br><br>There are several key aspects of the study of pragmatics that have fuelled the debate. Some scholars have suggested for instance that pragmatics isn't a discipline in its own right because it examines how people interpret and use the language, without necessarily referring to facts about what actually was said. This type of approach is known as far-side pragmatics. Others, however, have argued that the study should be considered a field in its own right, since it examines the ways in which the meaning and use of language is dependent on cultural and social factors. This is referred to as near-side pragmatics.<br><br>The field of pragmatics also discusses the inferential nature of utterances and the significance of the primary pragmatic processes in determining what a speaker means in the sentence. These are the issues discussed a bit more extensively in the papers written by Recanati and Bach. Both papers explore the notions saturation and free pragmatic enrichment. These are significant pragmatic processes that shape the overall meaning an utterance.<br><br>What is the difference between free and explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics focuses on how context affects linguistic meaning. It studies the way that the human language is utilized in social interaction and the relationship between speaker and interpreter. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are referred to as pragmaticians.<br><br>Many different theories of pragmatics have been developed over the years. Some, like Gricean pragmatics, 프라그마틱 카지노 ([https://linkagogo.trade/story.php?title=how-to-get-more-results-with-your-pragmatic-image additional reading]) concentrate on the intention of communication of a speaker. Relevance Theory, for  [https://bookmarking.win/story.php?title=10-healthy-pragmatic-ranking-habits 프라그마틱 슬롯 무료] [https://www.google.mn/url?q=https://writeablog.net/birchland69/what-pragmatic-free-trial-meta-experts-want-you-to-know 프라그마틱 무료]스핀 ([https://images.google.com.na/url?q=http://elektroavto.lv/user/lipgrease2/ simply click the up coming internet page]) example, focuses on the processes of understanding that occur when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some pragmatics theories have been merged with other disciplines, such as cognitive science and philosophy.<br><br>There are different opinions regarding the boundary between semantics and pragmatics. Some philosophers, like Morris believes that semantics and pragmatics are two distinct topics. He says that semantics deal with the relation of words to objects they may or not denote, while pragmatics is concerned with the usage of words in a context.<br><br>Other philosophers, like Bach and Harnish have suggested that pragmatics is a field that is part of semantics. They define "near-side" and "far-side" pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics is concerned with the content of what is said, while far-side is focused on the logical implications of saying something. They believe that semantics already determines certain aspects of the meaning of an utterance, while other pragmatics are determined by pragmatic processes.<br><br>One of the most important aspects of pragmatics is that it is a context-dependent phenomenon. This means that the same word can have different meanings in different contexts, depending on things such as ambiguity and indexicality. Other elements that can alter the meaning of an utterance are the structure of the speech, the speaker's intentions and beliefs, as well as listener expectations.<br><br>A second aspect of pragmatics is its cultural specificity. This is because different cultures have their own rules about what is acceptable to say in various situations. For instance, it is acceptable in certain cultures to make eye contact but it is considered rude in other cultures.<br><br>There are many different views of pragmatics, and lots of research is conducted in this field. There are many different areas of study, including computational and formal pragmatics as well as experimental and theoretical pragmatics, cross and intercultural linguistic pragmatics and clinical and experimentative pragmatics.<br><br>What is the relationship between free Pragmatics and to explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The linguistic discipline of pragmatics is concerned with the way meaning is conveyed by the use of language in context. It analyzes the way in which the speaker's intentions and beliefs contribute to interpretation, and focuses less on grammaral characteristics of the expression than on what is said. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are known as pragmaticians. The topic of pragmatics is connected to other areas of linguistics such as semantics, syntax, and philosophy of language.<br><br>In recent times the field of pragmatics developed in many different directions. These include conversational pragmatics and computational linguistics. There is a variety of research that is conducted in these areas, with a focus on topics such as the significance of lexical features as well as the interaction between language and discourse, and the nature of meaning itself.<br><br>In the philosophical discussion of pragmatism one of the main questions is whether it is possible to give a precise and systematic account of the relationship between pragmatics and semantics. Some philosophers have argued that it isn't (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have argued that the distinction between pragmatics and semantics isn't well-defined and that they are the same thing.<br><br>It is not unusual for  [http://lzdsxxb.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=3214806 프라그마틱 카지노] scholars to go back and forth between these two positions, arguing that certain phenomena fall under either semantics or pragmatics. Some scholars believe that if a statement has the literal truth conditional meaning, it's semantics. Others argue that the fact that a statement could be read differently is a sign of pragmatics.<br><br>Other researchers in the field of pragmatics have taken a different view and argue that the truth-conditional meaning of an expression is just one of the many ways in which the word can be interpreted and that all interpretations are valid. This method is often called far-side pragmatics.<br><br>Recent work in pragmatics has sought to combine semantic and far-side approaches trying to understand the full range of interpretive possibilities for an utterance by demonstrating how the speaker's intentions and beliefs contribute to the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. The 2019 version is an inverse Gricean model of Rational Speech Act framework, with technological innovations created by Franke and Bergen. The model predicts that listeners will consider a range of possible exhaustified parses of a speech that contains the universal FCI any, and that this is what makes the exclusiveness implicature so strong when compared to other plausible implicatures.

Latest revision as of 16:04, 8 January 2025

What is Pragmatics?

Pragmatics studies the connection between language and context. It addresses issues like what do people mean by the terms they use?

It's a philosophies of practical and reasonable actions. It's in contrast to idealism, the notion that you must abide to your convictions.

What is Pragmatics?

The study of pragmatics focuses on how people who speak a language interact and communicate with one and with each other. It is typically thought of as a part of language, although it differs from semantics in that pragmatics examines what the user wants to convey rather than what the actual meaning is.

As a field of research, pragmatics is relatively young and its research has grown quickly in the past few decades. It is a language academic field, but it has also had an impact on research in other fields like sociolinguistics, psychology and the field of anthropology.

There are many different perspectives on pragmatics, and they have contributed to its growth and development. One is the Gricean pragmatics approach, which focuses primarily on the notion of intention and the interaction with the speaker's knowledge about the listener's comprehension. Other perspectives on pragmatics include conceptual and lexical approaches to pragmatics. These views have contributed to the variety of topics that researchers in pragmatics have studied.

The research in pragmatics has been focused on a broad range of topics, including L2 pragmatic comprehension, request production by EFL learners and the role of the theory of mind in both mental and physical metaphors. It has also been applied to various social and cultural phenomena, like political discourse, discriminatory language and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also employed a variety of methodologies, from experimental to sociocultural.

Figure 9A-C illustrates that the size of the knowledge base on pragmatics is different depending on which database is used. The US and the UK are two of the top contributors in the field of pragmatics research. However, their position differs based on the database. This is due to pragmatics being a multidisciplinary area that intersects other disciplines.

It is therefore difficult to rank the top pragmatics authors according to the number of their publications. It is possible to determine influential authors based on their contributions to the field of pragmatics. For example Bambini's contribution to the field of pragmatics has led to concepts like conversational implicature and politeness theory. Grice, Saul, and Kasper are also highly influential authors of pragmatics.

What is Free Pragmatics?

The study of pragmatics is more concerned with the contexts and the users of language as opposed to the study of truth or reference, or grammar. It examines the ways in which one utterance can be understood to mean various things depending on the context and also those caused by ambiguity or indexicality. It also focuses on methods that listeners employ to determine which words are meant to be communicative. It is closely connected to the theory of conversative implicature which was developed by Paul Grice.

While the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is a well-known, long-established one, there is a lot of debate regarding the exact boundaries of these disciplines. For instance philosophers have suggested that the concept of sentence's meaning is an aspect of semantics. Others have claimed that this sort of thing should be viewed as a pragmatic issue.

Another area of controversy is whether the study of pragmatics should be regarded as to be a linguistics branch or a part of the philosophy of language. Some researchers have suggested that pragmatics is a discipline in its distinct from the other disciplines and should be considered distinct from the field of linguistics, alongside syntax, phonology semantics and more. Others have suggested the study of pragmatics is a part of philosophy since it focuses on the way in which our beliefs about meaning and uses of languages influence our theories of how languages work.

There are several key aspects of the study of pragmatics that have fuelled the debate. Some scholars have suggested for instance that pragmatics isn't a discipline in its own right because it examines how people interpret and use the language, without necessarily referring to facts about what actually was said. This type of approach is known as far-side pragmatics. Others, however, have argued that the study should be considered a field in its own right, since it examines the ways in which the meaning and use of language is dependent on cultural and social factors. This is referred to as near-side pragmatics.

The field of pragmatics also discusses the inferential nature of utterances and the significance of the primary pragmatic processes in determining what a speaker means in the sentence. These are the issues discussed a bit more extensively in the papers written by Recanati and Bach. Both papers explore the notions saturation and free pragmatic enrichment. These are significant pragmatic processes that shape the overall meaning an utterance.

What is the difference between free and explanatory Pragmatics?

The study of pragmatics focuses on how context affects linguistic meaning. It studies the way that the human language is utilized in social interaction and the relationship between speaker and interpreter. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are referred to as pragmaticians.

Many different theories of pragmatics have been developed over the years. Some, like Gricean pragmatics, 프라그마틱 카지노 (additional reading) concentrate on the intention of communication of a speaker. Relevance Theory, for 프라그마틱 슬롯 무료 프라그마틱 무료스핀 (simply click the up coming internet page) example, focuses on the processes of understanding that occur when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some pragmatics theories have been merged with other disciplines, such as cognitive science and philosophy.

There are different opinions regarding the boundary between semantics and pragmatics. Some philosophers, like Morris believes that semantics and pragmatics are two distinct topics. He says that semantics deal with the relation of words to objects they may or not denote, while pragmatics is concerned with the usage of words in a context.

Other philosophers, like Bach and Harnish have suggested that pragmatics is a field that is part of semantics. They define "near-side" and "far-side" pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics is concerned with the content of what is said, while far-side is focused on the logical implications of saying something. They believe that semantics already determines certain aspects of the meaning of an utterance, while other pragmatics are determined by pragmatic processes.

One of the most important aspects of pragmatics is that it is a context-dependent phenomenon. This means that the same word can have different meanings in different contexts, depending on things such as ambiguity and indexicality. Other elements that can alter the meaning of an utterance are the structure of the speech, the speaker's intentions and beliefs, as well as listener expectations.

A second aspect of pragmatics is its cultural specificity. This is because different cultures have their own rules about what is acceptable to say in various situations. For instance, it is acceptable in certain cultures to make eye contact but it is considered rude in other cultures.

There are many different views of pragmatics, and lots of research is conducted in this field. There are many different areas of study, including computational and formal pragmatics as well as experimental and theoretical pragmatics, cross and intercultural linguistic pragmatics and clinical and experimentative pragmatics.

What is the relationship between free Pragmatics and to explanatory Pragmatics?

The linguistic discipline of pragmatics is concerned with the way meaning is conveyed by the use of language in context. It analyzes the way in which the speaker's intentions and beliefs contribute to interpretation, and focuses less on grammaral characteristics of the expression than on what is said. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are known as pragmaticians. The topic of pragmatics is connected to other areas of linguistics such as semantics, syntax, and philosophy of language.

In recent times the field of pragmatics developed in many different directions. These include conversational pragmatics and computational linguistics. There is a variety of research that is conducted in these areas, with a focus on topics such as the significance of lexical features as well as the interaction between language and discourse, and the nature of meaning itself.

In the philosophical discussion of pragmatism one of the main questions is whether it is possible to give a precise and systematic account of the relationship between pragmatics and semantics. Some philosophers have argued that it isn't (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have argued that the distinction between pragmatics and semantics isn't well-defined and that they are the same thing.

It is not unusual for 프라그마틱 카지노 scholars to go back and forth between these two positions, arguing that certain phenomena fall under either semantics or pragmatics. Some scholars believe that if a statement has the literal truth conditional meaning, it's semantics. Others argue that the fact that a statement could be read differently is a sign of pragmatics.

Other researchers in the field of pragmatics have taken a different view and argue that the truth-conditional meaning of an expression is just one of the many ways in which the word can be interpreted and that all interpretations are valid. This method is often called far-side pragmatics.

Recent work in pragmatics has sought to combine semantic and far-side approaches trying to understand the full range of interpretive possibilities for an utterance by demonstrating how the speaker's intentions and beliefs contribute to the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. The 2019 version is an inverse Gricean model of Rational Speech Act framework, with technological innovations created by Franke and Bergen. The model predicts that listeners will consider a range of possible exhaustified parses of a speech that contains the universal FCI any, and that this is what makes the exclusiveness implicature so strong when compared to other plausible implicatures.