7 Simple Strategies To Totally Rocking Your Asbestos Lawsuit History

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Asbestos lawsuits have led to the bankruptcies of a number of businesses. An asbestos attorneys lawyer; click here for more, can assist you in getting compensation.

Experts in the field of health have warned for years about the dangers of exposure to asbestos. But, some industry leaders minimized the dangers. As time passed increasing numbers of people became ill with asbestos-related diseases.

The Third Case

asbestos attorney-related lawsuits started to gain momentum in the 1970s after studies by scientists began to connect asbestos with serious diseases like mesothelioma or asbestosis. Because these diseases often don't show symptoms until decades after exposure, thousands of lawsuits were filed. A majority of these lawsuits were brought in Texas where favorable laws made it an ideal location for this litigation saga.

Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos products. This case had a significant impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s it was revealed that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, put company profits before the safety and health of his employees. The testimony of a deposition revealed that he was heavily influenced by the company's chief medical advisor Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was an expert in his field who was known for his callous disregard of the health of employees.

Johns Manville was found to be aware of the dangers associated with asbestos, but did not take any action to protect their employees. The court declared that the company was liable for damages if workers later develop mesothelioma, or other asbestos-related diseases. The court also ruled that the company was liable for the family members of deceased workers.

Following the decision in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that used asbestos lawsuit. Most of these claims were denied due to a variety of reasons. Certain cases were allowed to continue, and the courts developed a set of guidelines for the handling of asbestos-related suits.

In the 1990s, asbestos defendants were still seeking legal rulings to restrict their liability. They wanted to to argue that asbestos materials were not a component of their product and therefore, they shouldn't be held accountable for the injuries suffered by people who worked with it. The claims were not successful and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to recognize the "asbestos product" defense.

State and federal laws protect the rights of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their condition from the responsible parties in a particular case. However, insurance companies continue to fight these claims with a hammer and a sledgehammer.